Convenient outrage

You know what I’m sick of? Our society’s fake outrage, our willingness to take to social media to decry one act or another( we are getting really good at this), as long as it doesn’t affect our needs and our lives. This last Saturday’s boxing match showed me that we are not as outraged by domestic violence as we would like to think.

When the video of Ray Rice dragging his girlfriend out of an elevator hit the Internet, social media went crazy and for good reason. Rice knocked his girlfriend out, then dragged her unconscious body out of the elevator, as if it was perfectly normal. The NFL responded, months later, by terminating his contract, but only after a firestorm of outcry.

Adrian Peterson, a very large man even by football’s standards, beat his child with a tree switch so violently that a doctor who examined him, called the authorities after seeing the bruises to the child’s legs and butt. Peterson was later convicted of child abuse. Peterson still plays football, but for how long remains to be seen.

In 2014, 12 professional football players were charged with domestic abuse. In the last 14 years, there have been 87 arrests. It is true the public is starting to take notice and voicing their disgust to the violence, but you know what? It is easy to be outraged and call for a player’s head when it really doesn’t affect our lives. It is easy to be outraged and offended by one player knowing we can still cheer for the team. But we are awfully quiet when it comes to a sport that involves just two opponents.

Case in point. A boxing match between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao took place Saturday night. It was hyped as the fight of the century! HBO practically begged its subscribers to purchase access to this live event; between daily e-mails and robo calls, it was hard to ignore their shameless plugging of the fight. Bars and restaurants used the event to lure customers into their establishments. People talked about it for weeks. The news media couldn’t talk about it enough, as if these two modern gladiators were exactly what we needed to get our minds off of Baltimore. And, yes I think it was sadly ironic that this was used to get our minds off of culturally unacceptable violence by hyping culturally sanctioned violence.

And here’s the thing. These two modern gladiators have horrible track records when it comes to women. Mayweather has been charged 5 times with domestic abuse, one leading to jail time. Pacquiao is a congressman from the Philippines who is against the use of contraceptives. He has been quoted as saying, “God said go forth and multiply, and he didn’t mean have one or two children”. That’s right ladies, Pacquiao thinks it’s your job to over-populate the earth because God said so. The poverty rate in the Philippines is nightmarishly high, with many of its citizens earning a dollar a day. Yet, Pacquiao, a man who made his fortune by not turning the other cheek, thinks it’s best to have children, even if you can’t afford to feed them because God said so. What a great guy!

Yet, when it was announced these two would fight on national TV for millions of dollars, no one cried out. No one called for the boycotting of HBO (are you kidding, and miss Games of Thrones?), and no one called for the boycotting of any bar that hosted the event. Mayweather is a convicted wife beater, yet where was the outrage?

To be fair, the media did mention his less than stellar view on women, but no one in the media questioned the idea of letting this man in the ring. And social media, the front lines in the battle of social outrage? Crickets. Oh sure there was some mention here and there about Mayweather, but it was largely in joke form or an excuse to cheer for Pacquiao. So what’s the difference? Why the calling for the football players heads, but not Mayweather’s? Here’s what I think (and yes, it’s only my opinin).

I think outrage is proportional to how much it affects those who are outraged. With football it is easy to pick out one player and demand justice. After all, even if he is terminated or evicted, the game goes on. We can sleep well knowing we collectively called for the end of company-sanctioned (or covered –up) domestic abuse while still enjoying the game. But with boxing we can’t do that. If we were to call for Mayweather and Tyson before him, to be banned the show wouldn’t go on. We would lose out on watching the fight of the century. It doesn’t matter that Mayweather has a long history of domestic abuse; we still want to see him fight. We paid out so much money to see him fight, Mayweather will end up earning up to $200 million dollars. In my opinion, all of this is outrageous.

Rethinking the college essay

Rebecca Schuman, Slates’ educational columnist, just published a piece titled, The end of the college essay. It’s an indictment against required essays and those who write them. It is a surprising view, coming from someone who most likely acquired and sharpen her writing skills thanks to college essays.

She sets the blame squarely on the students in her opening paragraph:

Everybody in college hates papers. Students hate writing them so much that they buy, borrow, or steal them instead. Plagiarism is now so commonplace that if we flunked every kid who did it, we’d have a worse attrition rate than a MOOC. And on those rare occasions undergrads do deign to compose their own essays, said exegetic masterpieces usually take them all of half an hour at 4 a.m. to write, and consist accordingly of “arguments” that are at best tangentially related to the coursework, font-manipulated to meet the minimum required page-count.

I don’t know about you, but I know burnout when I see it. Schuman may want to reconsider her chosen profession. Did she really mean to make such a generalized statement or is she just loath to read one more of her student’s papers? Can you imagine the pressure her students must feel after reading these words? I graduated summa cum laude, and yet, I’d be shaking and sweating, knowing my work would be judged this harshly. I’d pick up a bottle of merlot for her and tape the paper to it. It couldn’t hurt, right?

She goes on to rant, say:

Most students enter college barely able to string three sentences together—and they leave it that way, too. With protracted effort and a rhapsodically engaged instructor, some may learn to craft a clunky but competent essay somewhere along the way.

Here I have to agree with Schuman. Most students enter college barely able to string three sentences together, never mind a well thought out essay. It was a nightmare when we students were asked to read and then “grade” our fellow classmate’s work. I remember one student, a senior in college, changed tense mid-sentence. Sadly, many of these same skill sets can be found in first time writers. As an editor I have on many occasion, found myself banging my head against the wall, once again being asked by a publishing house to “clean up a novel”. Burn it maybe, but clean it up? Impossible.

I’ll never forget this passage:

Wilson offered Smith a cup of water. Smith refused it………………. Wilson gave Smith his second cup of water. Wait, what? Whose second cup? Wilson’s or Smith’s? How could Smith have a second cup of water if he refused the first? Obviously (?) the writer meant Wilson offered Smith a second cup, but to this day I have to wonder if Wilson drank the first cup and then offered another to Wilson.

But yet, unlike Schuman, I don’t blame students as much as I blame the college professors who allow poor sentence structure and grammar skills to go unchecked. I don’t know many professors who take the time to articulate and impress upon their students the importance of the well-written word. I have an idea Professor Schuman, how about making Writing 101 a required course? Make it the first course.

When I went back to school, I was one of those students the good professor seems to detest. I was well aware of my lack of writing skills and assumed my first course, “How to do research,” would help improve them. Sadly, this was not to be. It was incumbent upon me to learn how to write something worth reading. This I did by reading articles not unlike Schuaman’s. Starting a blog was a good way for me to strengthen my skills. I look back at some of those first posts with horror and embarrassment. Yet, I can count on one hand, how many professors corrected my work.

Schuman argues that college essay writing should be replaced with tests and oral exams, for this would be the only way to ensure students do not cheat for pay for essays. Maybe this will ensure the first class doesn’t cheat, but I guarantee you, the next class will know what’s on the test and what they will be expected to say. I know, because high school students engage in type of cheating. I remember my high school economics teacher was amazed by our ability to pick out which stocks were doing well that morning. He didn’t know, but as we went in, the exiting class passed on this valuable information.

Schuman suggests that good writing skills are no longer important for today’s job seekers. This may be true for those who aspire to work full time in low paying jobs, but for everyone else writing matters. My day job involves writing contracts and e-mails to those who don’t understand legal jargon. If I couldn’t express myself in legal and layman’s terms, I’d be out of a job.

Yes, students hate writing essays, but this has more to do with the type of essays they are asked to churn out. Maybe, instead of asking for a 10-page paper on the history of Christianity, (yes, this happened and by page six I knew I was in trouble, since I was still on the 3rd century) how about focusing on one aspect of the history? I would’ve given anything to write a 10 paper on the Medieval Christian world. At the time that was my passion and why I enrolled in the course. I had no idea I would be asked to condense a 4-inch book into 10 pages. How is that even possible? What professor would do that to themselves? No wonder Schuman appears to be on a ledge.

I was once instructed to write a 1600 word essay including 5 scholarly quotes. The subject was Faust. I enjoyed the subject, but found myself writing an essay based on the scholarly quotes I found on JSTOR. I had a lot to say about Goethe and mental illness, but yet felt most of what ended up on the essay was more about what scholars thought of his state of mind. I tried to balance my thoughts with theirs but my hard work didn’t pay off. I ended up with a B because I wrote 1605 words and used the same source twice. Never mind that this source was relevant to the topic.

Students are asked to write in the style of scholars. For the average student this is an exercise in futility as no one bothers to teach them how. Not all students aspire to be scholars, so why demand this of them?

In one of my earliest science classes we were told to write in our own voice. Our professor offered us the chance to write in the style we found most comfortable. He too complained about reading essays (but in a more jovial manner) and wanted us to focus on the subject, rather than the writing. I took a chance with one of my Power Point presentations. I knew Marc was a big fan of Monty Python. He would quote from Monty Python and the Holy Grail whenever he could. We had talked about the opening credits so I knew this was something he liked. As part of my Power Point narrative, I used the pythonesque gag of inserting something silly, and then apologizing for it. I knew I was taking an academic risk, but seriously, how many Power Point presentations about the Amazon River can one professor read without wanting to drown himself?

My jokes paid off. Not only did Marc like it, he called me at home to tell me so. He laughed so hard he had to stop grading for a while. Looking back, I feel a little bad for the remaining presentations. Sorry guys, I’m the reason why you probably disappointed him.

After that he insisted I include at least one gag in each of my papers. Our running joke was that I would place at least one outrages “fact” in my paper (including cite, it was college after all) and he would have to spot it.

It may make some of my professor friends cringe, but this paid of. I enjoyed writing science papers and in turn, fell in love with science. Not that the jokes got me off the hook mind you. I was judged by how well I communicated what I had learned. Marc had no problem kicking back poor writing and offering opinions on how I could do better.

Instead of bitching about students and their essays, how about finding a way to make the job more enjoyable for both? We should do away with 1600 word essays that do little but illustrate the ability to organize research. May I suggest, shorter, focused essays? Essays that allow students to write in their own voice, and explore what a given subject means to them. Trust me, the students who want to learn how to write well crafted essays will find a way. But this doesn’t mean professors should allow poor writing to go unchecked. Writing matters, whether it is in joke form or a well-crafted scholarly argument. Students and editors alike will thank you for it.

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

monsters, monsters, everywhere

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!