Fact or Fiction in books; who is responsible for published books?

Today as I labored to stay awake at work (my job is really boring) I caught up on some NPR podcasts. A subject came up that I thought was worth talking about here. Well really it is more of a question I want to pose to you all: Do you expect Publishers to take the time to vet nonfiction stories, especially when they are controversial. Do you hold them accountable when “nonfiction” turns out to be fiction?
By now you may know Henry Holt Publishing has pulled Charles Pellegrino’s book The Last Train from Hiroshima because it turns out the focus of the book Joseph Fuoco was a fraud (Fuoco is now deceased). Turns out Fuoco was not on the plane that escorted the Enola Gay. What tipped them off was his comment about the bomb. According to Fuoco an accident happened before they took off that depleted the power of the bomb. Can you imagine? The bomb was not as powerful as it could have been? Scientist and experts cried fraud and an investigation into Fuoco’s involvement ensued. Other characters turned out to be hard to track down so the publisher has decided to pull the book. Now there are questions about why Pellegrino’s work was not looked at a little more closely and why he chose to believer rather than investigate. Pellegrino is not talking right now, so it is hard to know if he chose to believe or if he knew all along he was writing fiction.
Henry Holt is taking responsibility as far a selling the book goes, but will not take responsibility for vetting the book. They say they do not have the time or man power to fact check books they offer as nonfiction. Several other publishers are saying the same. So the question comes up; why not take responsibility? After all they sell us a book as nonfiction, so why not take responsibility when what they sell us turns out to be a lie? Are they not then frauds themselves when they put their name on something that turns out to be nothing more than a good yarn?
Yes, it is hard to vet someone like James Fry who lies about his life, but to have a manuscript that could change the course of history is a different matter. After all it would only take a phone call or two to find out that Fuoco was not part of the military. I bet you could find the answer on Google! And when given a manuscript that disputes over 60 years of history, wouldn’t it be wise and prudent to make sure what you are about to offer is in fact, true?
When I buy a nonfiction book about history I know there may be a mistake, omission or factual error; no one has ever written a definitive history book completely error free. But when I buy a nonfiction book with a first person narrative I expect that person to be credible. I expect a publishing company that puts its name and reputation on a book to have at least made sure this person is who he/she claims to be. At some point an editor should question the author’s facts and supporting evidence.
What about you dear Reader? Do you hold the publishing company responsible for making sure nonfiction is just that, or do you buy into the idea that they do not have the time or man power to make sure what they are selling us is the real deal?
If you want to hear the NPR interview here is the link. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124495774
I am excited to announce my first giveaway is starting to pick up steam. Here is an updated list of the books that I have for the box so far:
Ruth Downie Persona Non Grata
Nick Hrnby How to be Good
M J Rose The Reincarnationist (autographed!)
Susan Abulahawa Mornings in Jenin
As promised I am adding more books for every five new followers.  I appreciate everyone who has joined and those who have spread the word. We have two more weeks, and I have plenty of shipping boxes! Can we get to 50? 100? Hey I would be happy if we saw more people commenting. After all, my goal is to have a community.  I want to hear from you!  

Grammar Week: Context is important

It is grammar week. I am not sure who decided this but there you are. We should be thinking about grammar and how we us it this week. Did I just mean we should be thinking about how we use it this week only, or did you get that I meant this week we should be thinking about it? Context and how we use or misuse it I the subject of this post. Free Dictionary online defines context as 1. The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning. I should have been careful where I put the word week.
When we do not clearly state our intent or omit important parts of a statement others may misinterpret our meaning. I have found this can lead to embarrassing mistakes or it can make a reader mad at us and misunderstand the point we are trying to make. This month I have had both situations happen because I was not clear. I knew what I was talking about, but readers of my words did not.

My friend Faith of Faith’s Book Blog and I are reading Living Dead in Dallas as a co-read. We also belong to the yahoo group Mostly Books (come join us, we are fun) and have used the group’s board to talk about the book. Last night, after finishing the book I went to the board to leave Faith a message. I was in a hurry and wanted to write a quick subject line. One that would let the other members know this was a post to Faith about the book. I wrote: Faith Dead in Dallas, and thought nothing of it. Oh what I hit I got! Naturally the other’s gave me a bad time and were all rather good natured about it. Faith did let the members know she is alive and well in New Jersey but still I was mortified! What a horrid subject post! What if one of our members saw this post and thought Faith had died. We had a member pass a few months ago and I remember how my stomach lurched when I saw the subject line “we lost a member”. Though members come and go, I knew the subject line was not informing the group about a member who unsubed. See, this is my job as the moderator, so it was a double mistake that I would write Faith Dead in Dallas. I should have taken the time to write Faith: I finished Dead in Dallas. Even though I knew what I was talking about, the context of my sentence was unclear and subject to misinterpretation. Again I apologize to Faith and have learned an important lesson on making sure I write with clear meaning and intent.

Earlier this month I was in a hot and heavy class debate over Jesus and his message. I go to a state college that sits right in the heart of the Southern Bible belt. Many times I have to educate Christians on the history of the church or history of Jerusalem during the time of Jesus. To put it in context, NPR has reported that 30% of American Christians think Judaism came after Christianity; I believe these people live in the school district of the University of North Carolina, where I attend class. A classmate and I were arguing about Jesus’ intent. I wrote “ Jesus was a Rabbi who was taking the Jews to task for being too Roman”. My meaning was clear but apparently my words were taken out of context by another student who happened to be Jewish. Sometimes we write a clear message but because we do not expand on our intent others do not understand our message. My Jewish classmate thought I was arguing that Jesus was trying to make Christians out of the Jews and took me to task for this. She wrote a very long rant chewing me out for my views. I wrote her back and asked her to read my post as if I was a Jew, making a point about Jesus being a Jew not a Christian. She read my post again and apologized for her rant. She misunderstood where I was coming from. Though my statement was clear my point was not. I should have said “Jesus was a Rabbi who was not trying to change the religion; rather he was trying to save it”. This would have made my statement stronger and not subject to misinterpretation.

So you see dear Reader, even though we always know what we mean, care must be taken when writing to others. We do not want our words taken out of context; we must strive to write with clear meaning and intent. Happy Grammar week, may you always be understood.

If you like Grammar I suggest checking out the Podcasts Grammar Girl’sQuick and Dirty Tricks and Karen Reddick, The Red Pen Editor. Both are fun and educational.

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

monsters, monsters, everywhere

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!