Shakespeare & Stephen King, my Sunday musing

Sunday morning musing
Sunday morning musing

While giving a lecture or engaging one-on-one with people who are unfamiliar with Shakespeare the question, “Why should I like Shakespeare?” always pops up. My standard answer is “You probably already do” which then leads me to an explanation of Shakespeare’s influence on pop-culture. In fact this question is a great starting point when talking about the continued fascination with work that is over 400 years old.

Most of you already know that Shakespeare’s influence can be found in modern movie plots (think Lion King to 10 things I hate about you), book titles, operas, classical music, advertising, and over used, some times badly quoted idioms. This may seem a bit hyperbolic, but I’d bet that every writer including journalists, speechwriters, and novelists have tried at least once to sneak a quote or two into his or her work.

I pay close attention to Shakespeare’s influence on our world in order to be able to answer the above question with fresh and surprising answers. Last week I heard two quotes from MSNBC pundits used to address the current political news cycle. Chris Hayes wondered if Donald Trump’s campaign is little more than “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”. The answer to this is yes. Chris Matthews quipped, “Is this much ado about nothing?” in reference to the FBI’s findings on Hilary Clinton’s e-mail “scandal”. The answer to this is, who the hell knows since the FBI and CIA cannot agree on what was classified and what wasn’t, and no one has adequately addressed the difference between her private server and other government officials’ private servers. But I digress. My point is that Shakespeare is all around us, even if we don’t know it.

feo8uUiuRXiXUlN7xIrGiQ

Shakespeare can be found in some surprising places. Right now I have Hotspur Ale in my refrigerator and an Ophelia chardonnay in my wine collection. You may snicker, but the ale is one way to get my step-dad to appreciate Shakespeare, and the wine is a good way to drown a week’s worth of stress.

On Friday’s episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, the host asked one of his guests, “We think of the Danes as morose, do you think this is because of Hamlet?” The guest did not seem to find this question amusing and noted that the Danish people were a happy lot.

I’ve heard Shakespeare quoted and referenced in so many ways over the last year that little surprises me. Sometimes I giggle, sometimes I just sigh but mostly I just note it for later use. I’ve come to expect it from writers and those looking to make a “smart” point. But this morning I came across a reference, at least I think it’s a reference, that took me by complete surprise.

Child Rowland to the dark tower came;
His word was still
Fie, foh, and fum!
I smell the blood of a British man. (Edgar, King Lear)

I was looking at Lear in order to find a quote for this morning’s hashtag game #ShakespeareSunday. I’ve read and heard these lines many times, but for some reason it wasn’t until this morning that I made a modern connection to them. And I will admit, I could be completely wrong, but it’s worth musing over, don’t you think?

 

The Dark Tower
The Dark Tower

For those of you who have no idea what I am talking about I point you to Stephen King’s The Dark Tower series and his hero Roland . And to make this musing even more relevant ( or amusing if you wish) is the fact that some American fans of the book series are up in arms over the casting choice of Roland in the upcoming movie adaptation; a British black actor will be playing the lead character. Some of these nutters are calling for his blood.

As  stated above, I admit I could be completely wrong about the connection between Shakespeare’s Rowland’s dark tower and Stephen King’s Roland’s dark tower as I’ve only read the first three books and never thought “Lear”, and from what I know of Lear it would be hard to make a good argument for a close connection between to the two. But then again…Both men are outcasts who find purpose in protecting someone and something important to his sense of self.

In Lear Edgar utters these random lines (actually he sings them) as while disguised as Poor Tom, (poverty and madness personified) after being rejected by his family and society. Edgar has lost everything and is forced out into the wilderness where he encounters harsh weather and unnatural forces that bring him back into contact with his father. I could break down the plot involving Edgar and his father, but I promised myself this would be a short post, (and I suspect most of you know the plot already) so suffice to say that Edgar is reunited with his now blind and helpless father after they both become victims of unjust revenge and circumstances beyond their control.

Stephen King begins his series with what is called one of the greatest lines in all of modern literature, “The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed”. The novel tells the story of Roland the gunslinger, who is forced out into the desert (wilderness) to chase the man in black and becomes involved in circumstances that are wildly out of his control. Like Edgar, Roland encounters unnatural forces and is confronted by a sense of helplessness by many of the people he encounters. Readers of the book are never blatantly confronted by a “mad” Roland, but his brand of justice and his single minded quest to find the man in black does make one wonder if he isn’t just one step from the edge…

Anyway, this is my Sunday musing. It’s been on my mind all morning and I am sure it will continue to haunt me all day. This is where you come in. Tell me, do you find these lines of Edgar as a possible influence on King, or am I making much ado about nothing?

Branagh’s Romeo & Juliet, my review

ROMEO AND JULIET by Shakespeare,         , Writer - William Shakespeare, Director - Rob Ashford and Kenneth Branagh, Set and Costume Designer - Christopher Oram, Lighting - Howard Hudson, The Garrick Theatre, London, 2016,  Credit: Johan Persson
ROMEO AND JULIET by Shakespeare, , Writer – William Shakespeare, Director – Rob Ashford and Kenneth Branagh, Set and Costume Designer – Christopher Oram, Lighting – Howard Hudson, The Garrick Theatre, London, 2016, Credit: Johan Persson

Two households, both alike in dignity,
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.
From forth the fatal loins of these two foes
A pair of star-cross’d lovers take their life;
Whose misadventured piteous overthrows
Do with their death bury their parents’ strife.
The fearful passage of their death-mark’d love,
And the continuance of their parents’ rage,
Which, but their children’s end, nought could remove,
Is now the two hours’ traffic of our stage;
The which if you with patient ears attend,
What here shall miss, our toil shall strive to mend.

These are the opening lines of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. The Chorus pulls no punches in his brief summary of what the audience is about to see. The Chorus could hardly be clearer, thought I suppose we could break it down to one sentence. Two noble families discover that their ongoing feud brings about in the death of each houses’ child and in this tragedy finally find peace.

You could argue that the Chorus is offering the first “trigger warning” as he mentions the word death twice, notes the lover’s “end” and let’s us know they will “take their life”.  The play is supposed to be a double warning about passion; old feuds make for new deaths and if not checked, lead to dangerous and rash decisions. In other words, passion, whether it is fueled by rage or by lust, can lead to bitter consequences.

You’d think these lines would be sufficient for the audience’s understanding of Shakespeare’s intent, but you’d be wrong. Time and time again directors ignore the playwright’s overall double theme of passion, so much so that Romeo and Juliet is now thought of as the western canon’s greatest love story. The biggest problem with this idea (besides offering the greatest love story as a double suicide) is in its execution; if this play is the west’s greatest love story, why then do so many productions fall short of offering a great love story? Why are audiences and reviewers always so critical of what they have just witnessed? I argue it is because we view the play much as Plato viewed forms; while the abstract is always pure and perfect, any attempt to recreate it into base matter will always result in some pollution and never fully measure up to our ideal play. Romeo and Juliet may be thought of as the perfect love story, but in reality it is far from the perfect love story. The audience’s expectation is never fully met, yet some how this play continues to draw both crowds and directors who are convinced that ‘This time it will be great!”

Take for example Kenneth Branagh’s latest adaptation, produced for the Garrick London stage. The play should have been a hit as it offers Branagh as co-director and two young actors, Lily James and Richard Madden who wowed audiences in Cinderella. Yet critics find little to love in about this play. The Guardian says, “The plot is slapdash; the coincidences preposterous; the main characters not interestingly conflicted, just doomed”. The Telegraph thought James saved the play (they must have seen it on a different night than I) but finds Madden “ordinary” and saw no value in Derek Jacob version of an older Mercutio: “He’s generations older than his pal Romeo, this refined gent who minces into view, in mock attitude of an old groover, silver-topped cane (sheathing a sword) a-twirl. He might have stepped out of The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, and there’s little sense of a life cruelly cut short when he hobbles off, bleeding to death”.

Both reviews found the play lackluster, and though both could point to some specifics, each noted that there was something amiss but couldn’t quite pin down exactly what it lacked. For me there is little doubt what it lacked. It lacked focus and the passion the play is supposed to represent.

The beautiful verses Shakespeare wrote fall flat when uttered by James and Madden. The Guardian notes, “Their speaking is earthbound”, and I have to agree; in fact most of the actors fall short of delivering anything that resembles passion. As my friend noted, Juliet’s father spoke his lines as if he was reading from cue cards, or at least yelling from cue cards.

In order for this play to work as any kind of love story the two characters must show the passion they have for each other along with the emotional instability brought on by a lost love. Shakespeare uses the word “death” 48 times in the play but balances these lines with some of his best flowery speech about love. Both Romeo and Juliet foreshadow their deaths several times but gush over each other with equal measure. But James stumbles and mumbles Juliet’s famous lover’s vow, “My bounty is as boundless as the sea. My love as deep. The more I give to thee,. The more I have, for both are infinite” yet emphasizes her fear of living without Romeo crying out, “Come, cords, come, nurse; I’ll to my wedding-bed; and death, not Romeo, take my maidenhead!” The constant stress on death was so over the top that my friend turned to me and quipped, “Hey you think Romeo is going to die? This constant stress on death made the play less of a love story and more like an inevitable head on collision.

And here in lies the problem with this play. While the audience is being primed for the inevitable end so are the characters. It seems like the two know they are doomed from the start so any declaration of love rings hollow especially given the two actor’s lackluster performances.

This version of the play is a perfect illustration of my argument against this being a love story. The coincidences that result in the double deaths are absurd and when emphasized make for a strange and silly story (what is Paris doing in Juliet’s tomb in the middle of the night?). Shakespeare tells us right up front that this is warning to those who continue to fight and the consequences of hate. Yet for some reason we’ve convinced ourselves that this is a love story; one that is told rather badly time and time again. No wonder audiences and critics are always let down.

But if you really feel the need to see this version, it runs through August 3rd.

 

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

monsters, monsters, everywhere

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!