Romeo and/or Juliet by Ryan North The dumbing down of Shakespeare

Ryan North Riverhead Books Penguin Random House 2016
Ryan North
Riverhead Books
Penguin Random House
2016

“You are Sari! Right now you are standing in a library looking at the books in the “New Arrival” rack, wondering if “Romeo and/or Juliet a chooseable-path adventure” would smell just as sweet as the original story. You hesitantly reach out to pick it up.

If you pick it up continue to paragraph 2.

If you laugh and think, “oh hell no”, stop reading this post.

You pick it up wondering if this is truly something that would encourage your average teen to become engaged with Shakespeare. You flip to a random page out of curiosity. With mild trepidation you read a paragraph. The first thing you notice is the simplistic writing style. The author uses short, concise sentences. You wonder if he does this out of fear that his audience has a short attention span. As you read on, you wonder if the author has a short attention span. As you flip to the next page to read more, you wonder if the author is 10 years old. You begin to regret your current life choices, beginning when you read the title of the book you now hold in your hand.

It’s occurred to me that with the plethora of books we’ve seen published in the last 24 months with “Shakespeare” in their titles that my best course of action would be to smother my keyboard with tuna and allow my cat license to stomp around my computer for a few hours and then submit the mess to a publisher under the title “A Feline’s Guide to Shakespeare”. My luck it would hit the bestseller’s list and my cat would become the academic hero of the family. When will publishers say, “Enough is enough”!

Oh sure this book by Ryan North is full of words, words, words, but as an intro to Shakespeare it is useless. The library has classified the book as suitable for ages 8 to 16. Did the publisher suggest this? I’m not sure a book that makes use of several sexual references is suitable for 8 year olds and the writing is far too simplistic for 16 year olds.

In this adventure you start out as Juliet but quickly become Romeo who can choose to fall in love with Juliet or fall in love with a dude (North’s word, not mine), making it very un-Shakespeare like and more of a modern “politically correct” book. So much for Shakespeare.

There is very little in the way of Shakespeare’s work in this book. Most of it consists of Ryan’s self-indulging humor(I could almost hear him laughing at his own jokes). He starts off on the wrong foot when he says it’s Juliet’s 17th birthday (she’s actually 14) and quickly goes off the rails from there.

You have things to do too, Juliet. You tear through some quick stomach crunches (three reps of ten) and some pec blasts (four reps of eight), and your ready to start your day. So! Your well muscled and your family’s rich. What’s for breakfast? (page 4)

This is modern Shakespeare?
This is modern Shakespeare?

How are we to take this book? Surly this cannot be taken as a serious effort to get teens into classical literature. And if this is indicative of modern teen books, it shouldn’t surprise us that fewer and fewer teens are choosing to read as a leisurely pursuit.

It appears Mr. North does have an audience. His first choose an adventure book, Hamlet, was funded by Kickstarter. That book turned out to be the most funded publishing project for the company to date. This must have emboldened Mr. North to try again with Random House behind the project. I just wish I understood his aim (besides monetary gain). Did he really believe he this would bring teens closer to Shakespeare or did he also notice that anything with Shakespeare in its title would be easy to publish?

Personally I don’t think dumbing down Shakespeare or turning his work into adventure stories is doing our culture any favors. I see this type of art as part of the problem we are now facing. The government’s emphasis on more science-based education is pushing the Humanities to the outer edges. Colleges are bemoaning the fact that students are not receiving a well-rounded education because of this. Books like North’s do little in the way of helping the situation, as his simplistic approach to “Shakespeare” is little more than an adventure into the land of pop-fiction. And lousy pop-fiction at that.

I’d recommend skipping this adventure.

What plays would you use to introduce a neophyte to Shakespeare?

Shakespeare1

One of my favorite readers and someone I call friend, asked the questions what are the best plays to use to introduce a neophyte to Shakespeare? Or someone turned off by bad experiences in high school or college?” It is a question I am asked a lot but one that I always struggle to answer. Literature, like all art is subjective. What speaks to me may turn you off. It’s hard to tell what will move someone else. Given that disclaimer, let’s go ahead and look at some of Shakespeare’s plays that may be the best way to introduce someone to his world.

Let’s start with reading. As I said yesterday, it’s okay to read Shakespeare and though you may not get a sense of how beautiful his words sound, you certainly will get a sense of how beautifully they flow. Whenever I recommend reading Shakespeare, I always suggest that the reader take a few passages and read them out loud. It’s something we learned to do in college; it helped the students get a sense of the poetry and word play that Shakespeare is so famous for.

Julius Caesar

Julius Caesar is one of the easiest plays to read. I read it (thought admittedly did not fully understand it) when I was 10. Antony’s “lend me your ears” speech moved my young soul and thrilled me to no end. I memorized the speech and was an annoyance to friends, family, and my teacher for months. I would stop and recite the speech at the drop of a hat. As I write this, a memory of me jumping on a playground bench comes to mind. I belted out the speech just to see if I could get the other kids to lend me their ears. But I am no actor. I am sure if they had tomatoes, I would have been human ketchup in no time.

JC is easy to follow as it has the simplest plot of all of the plays. A group of Roman senators are afraid the Caesar is becoming too powerful and will tip the balance of the Republic by becoming the ultimate authority over Rome. This plot allows the reader to contemplate the true meaning of justice and authority. While Shakespeare could have easily given us a play in terms of black and white/ good and bad, he instead offers us Brutes, one of the most conflicted characters of his cannon. Most of us live our lives trying to do the right thing, but with JC Shakespeare asks us to consider how we determine what the right thing is.

Macbeth

I’ve talked in the past about how Lady Macbeth’s hand washing led me to reconsider how I conducted myself in high school and beyond. As a young person who was unsure of who I wanted to be, her actions gave me pause; never would I do something that would stain my soul.

Reading Macbeth in high school reminded me that free will at times is an illusion. I think everyone in my English class instinctively understood that Shakespeare was showing us that absolute power corrupts absolutely. The language was a little daunting but nothing a young person couldn’t get through. Yes, when we first started reading it many students felt intimidated but by the time we were done I don’t remember anyone regretting having read it.

Hamlet

This is the first on my list that could be equally a great reading or viewing introduction. I included it here because I read it after I saw the play. Having watched Hamlet I still wondered what all of the fuss was about. It wasn’t my favorite of Shakespeare’s play until I read it. There are so many great lines, so many great moments that only a slow careful read gives us the full picture and you come to understand why this is Shakespeare’s masterpiece. But once you read it, seeing it performed is a must. It was chilling to hear Cumberbatch rebuke his former friend Guildenstern, as Hamlet realizes his “friend” is now Claudius’ spy.

Why, look you now, how unworthy a thing you make of me! You would play upon me. You would seem to know my stops. You would pluck out the heart of my mystery. You would sound me from my lowest note to the top of my compass. And there is much music, excellent voice, in this little organ, yet cannot you make it speak? ‘Sblood, do you think I am easier to be played on than a pipe? Call me what instrument you will, though you can fret me, yet you cannot play upon me.

Henry V

I first read Henry V as part of my master’s program. This happened to coincide with the BBC series “The Hollow Crown”, so we eagerly studied it in preparation of the show. It is very easy to understand, notes help with the historical facts behind the argument over Henry’s legitimacy but over all a wonderful introduction to Shakespeare. It has many over lapping messages and lessons. We looked at it as an allegory for the way in which politicians use the power of words as calls to action. We compared Henry’s speeches to modern leaders and found some things never change. Kennedy asked us to do more as if he was calling us to the breaches in order to get to the moon. Bush’s “you’re either with us or against us” speech could have been director to the governor of Harfleur. It’s the second play that I would suggest could also be used visually to introduce someone to Shakespeare. Though beware, most adaptations skip the awful scene of the dead boys killed by the French as they stayed in the camp. Any sympathy we may have had with the French King dies with the young men. Yes, Shakespeare tells us, war is hell.

Viewing Shakespeare can be a thrilling way to be introduced to his work, if and only if, the production is worthy of his words. A great actor can breathe life into Shakespeare’s poetry, bombast, and bawdy word play. Seeing Shakespeare for the first time is a thrilling event and can leave an audience member wanting more.

Much ado about nothing

This one is for the ladies. Any time a woman tells me she can’t get into Shakespeare a smirk appears up on my face. I ask her to watch Kenneth Branagh’s Much Ado About Nothing. Oh to see him and Emma Thompson fall in love despite their shared distain of such emotion is pure perfection. And then there is Michael Keaton as Dogberry. Is there anything left to say?

Hamlet

For all of the reasons I noted above, Hamlet is a must for any introduction to Shakespeare. If you can’t see it live, I suggest starting with Mel Gibson in the Zeffirelli film. I really wanted to like David Tennant as Hamlet, but I don’t think he was able to capture the agony and frustration as well as Gibson did. A really fun treat is to find Mystery Science Theater 3000’s riff on an old black and white German adaptation on Hamlet. But don’t let this be your introduction to Shakespeare.

As you like it

This is a very fun play and one that seems to be produced often enough that it should be easy to find locally. Rosalind is a strong female character and is arguably one of Shakespeare’s strongest characters. She takes charge of her circumstance as best she can while trying to navigate her way through the unknown. She is banished to the forest of Arden just as she is coming of age. College students can identify with her plight and marvel at her hesitation to fall for the first man who shows her some interest.

The play contains some of Shakespeare’s most well known quotes included the”7 ages of man” speech. Yes, all the world’s a stage, and in this play Shakespeare shows us how at times we all play different parts. It’s a feel good play that ends as we like it; with love and laughter.

A midsummer’s night dream

I’ve seen good productions and bad productions, but yet even the bad productions can be a life-changing event. This play like no other invites the audience to enter into a fantasy world in which fairies meddle in the affairs of men. Love and lust, we learn can and often overlap. We are forced to ask ourselves if we can really tell the difference between the two.

One of the best things about a live production of AMSND is the ending, when Puck makes the final speech

If we shadows have offended,
Think but this, and all is mended,
That you have but slumber’d here
While these visions did appear.
And this weak and idle theme,
No more yielding but a dream,
Gentles, do not reprehend:
if you pardon, we will mend:
And, as I am an honest Puck,
If we have unearned luck
Now to ‘scape the serpent’s tongue,
We will make amends ere long;
Else the Puck a liar call;
So, good night unto you all.
Give me your hands, if we be friends,
And Robin shall restore amends.

Works Cited
William Shakespeare Hamlet, Folger edition
William Shakespeare A Midsummer’s Night Dream Folger edition

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

I write literary horror - poems, short stories, and books

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!