The devil you know

 

9781403969330

Whenever I walk into a casino here in Nevada, I’m reminded of the story of Job. Gamblers have their favorite places to play, depending on the type of “perks” offered. Some will be thrilled with “free” meal coupons; others “free” drink chips while others enjoy the benefit of discounted event and hotel lodging rates. Most do not understand none of this is truly free. The casinos can afford to give away free stuff and do so liberally, because they want something in return; your money and loyalty. Like Satan, who questioned Job’s loyalty to God, I have to wonder, “how many of these gamblers would continue to worship at the altar of slot machines if these freebies were taken away”?

As you recall, one day God assembled his small counsel apparently to brag about the humans who worship him. “Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one like him on earth, a blameless and upright man who fears God and turns away from evil”. (Job. 1 8)

Hassantan, (Satan’s original name) replies, “Have you not put a fence around him and his house and all that he has on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land”. (Job 1.10) Satan is questioning God’s assertion because Job seems only too happy to continue to worship and give thanks to God for everything he has. But, what would happen if everything were to be taken away? Would Job continue to worship God? The two enter into a cosmic bet. God allows Satan to take everything away from Job, including his family, in order to test the man’s faith. In the end, after loosing it all, Job continues to worship God even as he question’s God’s actions. Job continues to worship because he thinks there will be a big payoff at the end of his life. So too did loyal gamblers, when, during the recession, casinos pulled back on perks. Like Job they hope for a big payoff.

I don’t bring this up to talk about gambling. This to me is one big cosmic joke; that people continue to spend their hard earned money on slot machines, hoping to strike it rich all while sitting in houses of opulence. Don’t they get that the house always wins?

I bring this up to talk about the Satan we know, or at least think we know. T.J. Wray and Gregory Mobley are the authors of, the birth of satan, Tracing The Devil’s Biblical Roots .(their use of capitalization, not mine) In it, they trace the origin and evolution of Satan. It is a well researched book into the history of how Hassantan (meaning adversary) went from being one of God’s counsel members, the one who tests human loyalty, to being the cause of misery and evil; a being God seems to have little control over.

As the story of Job illustrates, Satan’s original role in the Bible was simply to be an adviser to God. Satan was allowed to roam Earth, checking on human progress and action. He reported back to God. This is why he and God started to discuss Job and why God entered into a bet with him. This is not a story of a clash of Titans; this is a story in which a supreme being allowed a lesser being to bring strife to another creature.

The next time we see Satan is in the book of Zechariah, in which yet another small counsel is formed. This time, a priest named Joshua is being tested to see if he is worthy of being a co-regent in post- exile Jerusalem. Here, Satan is playing “devil’s advocate” as he sits and accuses the priest of being sinful. The Bible does not tell us what sins Joshua has committed, but that God has decided to forgive him. God rebukes Satan and draws his own conclusion about the priest. Yet it is worth noting that once again the two are working together. Satan, it seems, was just doing his job.

What I found most interesting about this book is not so much how the evolution of Satan takes place-as people started to question a God who is both wise and wrathful a physical personality split takes place- but that the Satan we know is not found in the Bible. The hellish creature with a pitchfork and horns is found in stories that did not make it into the Hebrew or Christian bibles. This fascinates me because this means most of what we know comes down to us from oral traditions.

The stories may not have made it into our sacred text, but are stories that were passed around and talked about. People would have heard about the evils of Satan in church and then at home. What we think we know comes from hundreds of years of embellishment to fit the time. Western literature has also had a role in the evolution of Satan. You will find him in all his glory in Milton’s Paradise Lost and Dante’s Inferno. We need to keep in mind that the original monotheistic believers did not intend to have opposing celestial beings. Their one true god was equally wrathful and loving. It is only after having so many bad things happen that the chosen people begin to question their god of choice. Something was wrong with this picture.

After reading the book, it became clear that God’s original adversary evolved for two reasons. First, as people became uncomfortable with a God who both gives and takes away and began questioning the value of worshiping him, a split had to take place. We see this evident split in the pages of the Hebrew Bible. In the book of Samuel it is God who incited David to count the people of Israel. Census taking is forbidden in Exodus, but in Samuel, God is mad at the people of Israel and brings a plague upon the people. “Again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go and count the people of Israel and Judah.” (Sam. 24-1) In Chronicles, written much later, it is Satan who is the cause of the census and plague, “Satan stood up against Israel, and incited David to count the people of Israel. (Chron 21.1) This later retelling of the same story, shifts the blame from God to Satan. Innocent people died, not by the hand of God, but by the evil of Satan.

The second reason is that as humans we just can’t seem to handle personal responsibility. Maybe this flaw is part of our genetic makeup because early man had little control over his environment. The natural world was a harsh place. Early man had to live with the fact that “shit happened”. From this the first motto of man may have been, “it’s not my fault”. We havn’t seemed to let this one go.

The book isn’t just a look at how Satan evolved in the Bible, but also of how we view him. He is often the embodiment of whatever evil is taking place at the time. We use him to explain that which we cannot control. He is why shit happens. For the authors, this is important and why he matters. I highly recommend the book. Decide for yourself if he is a character worth keeping.

New Rules For The Modern Detective

imagesAs a tribute to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, born on this day in 1859, I thought I pulled this from the archive. Doyle did not invent the detective story (that would be Poe) but he did give us one of the first who had some serious issues. So just for fun, let’s talk about the flawed detective.

Why are today’s detective fiction protagonists so full of angst? Along with crime solving we are forced to watch as the well-educated Kay Scarpetta has a tragic affair with a married man. It’s fun to watch gritty John Rebus solve homicides in Scotland’s underbelly, but not so much to watch him battle his alcohol addiction. The Alex Deleware books were fun, until his personal life became the major plot points of Kellerman’s books. Yes, we do want fictional characters to have personalities and quirks so we can identify with them, but at some point we’d probably tell our best friends they needed help if they had the problems we see with today’s fictional detectives.

It wasn’t always like this. During the Golden Age of Detective Fiction, authors adhered to the Rules of Fair Play. These rules were put in place as a sort of pact with their readers. Detective fiction in the late 1920’s and 30’s assured readers that if proper attention was given to a book, they too could solve the crime right along with their favorite detective. This is why when Agatha Christy published “And then there were none” in 1939, both critics and readers were outraged as she purposely ignored the pact and guidelines. But even Christy would not dare over-humanize (yes, I just made that up) her characters.

This was the beauty of early detective fiction, there was less attention given to the characters so that the bulk of the story could center on the crime in question. Oh sure Holmes had his addiction, but Doyle did not make this a major plot point. Come to think of it, it would be kinda fun to read “Holmes and the Rehab Center”. Here Holmes could face his dependence while pointing out character flaws in the other patients. Many novelists today would do well to dial back the angst and instead focus on getting rid of plot holes or doing away with the surprise villain. Villains who come out of nowhere because the author was so busy attending to characterization that he or she forgot to figure out “who dun it”.

The rules of the game were codified in 1929 by Ronald Knox and agreed upon by the British authors Detective Club.  According to Knox, a detective story:

“Must have as its main interest the unraveling of a mystery; a mystery whose elements are clearly presented to the reader at an early stage in the proceedings, and whose nature is such as to arouse curiosity, a curiosity which is gratified at the end.”

Knox’s “Ten Commandments” are as follows:

  1. The criminal must be mentioned in the early part of the story, but must not be anyone whose thoughts the reader has been allowed to know.
  2. All supernatural or preternatural agencies are ruled out as a matter of course.
  3. Not more than one secret room or passage is allowable.
  4. No hitherto undiscovered poisons may be used, nor any appliance which will need a long scientific explanation at the end.
  5. No Chinaman must figure in the story. (No he wasn’t being a racist, perhaps just tired of the many Fu Manchu books being churned out. Okay, it still sounds racist)
  6. No accident must ever help the detective, nor must he ever have an unaccountable intuition which proves to be right.
  7. The detective himself must not commit the crime.
  8. The detective is bound to declare any clues which he may discover.
  9. The “sidekick” of the detective, the Watson, must not conceal from the reader any thoughts which pass through his mind: his intelligence must be slightly, but very slightly, below that of the average reader.
  10. Twin brothers, and doubles generally, must not appear unless we have been duly prepared for them

Historians now think Knox was being sarcastic, yet it is well documented that the British Detective Club took them rather seriously. They called Christy out and Sayers blatantly broke the rules with Gaudy Night.

We can laugh at these rules, but for almost 20 years they helped form the genre we now call “cozy mysteries”. Perhaps what we need is a new set of rules, even if they are taken as sarcasm.

  1. No detective can have more than one love interest at a time.
  2. Villains cannot appear out of then air. They have to be at least mentioned once prior to being named the culprit.
  3. Addictions cannot be made public. If fictional characters are to remain true to life, then any addiction must be hidden from the public, this includes the reading public
  4. Twists cannot be so convoluted as to make the writers of Mission Impossible spit out their coffee and yell, “no body would believe that shit”! (I’m looking at you Dan Brown)
  5. If you insist on writing a historical crime novel do some research. And no, watching the entire Downton Abbey and Brother Cadfael series does not count. I for one do not want to read another medieval mystery in which one character turns to another and says, “See you next weekend”. Medieval life was nasty, brutish and short. And they sure as hell didn’t get the weekends off.

Okay, so I started the list. What do you think? What would you add to it?

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

monsters, monsters, everywhere

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!