There is a yet again a resurgent interest in Bigfoot. No, I am not talking about American cable television’s manic obsession with the beast. Thankfully this seems to be on the wane. After 7 years, Finding Bigfoot may be gone, in large part because it has yet to find a clue, never mind an 8-foot monster. No, its now mainstream science and journalists who are jumping on the Wildman’s bandwagon.
Former Oxford Professor of genetics, Brian Sykes, put a call out for Bigfoot samples a few years back as part of a plan to conduct genetic analysis of the material. He and his colleagues called this the Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project. What he found remains as elusive as what he was looking for. At first it was thought he found a possible hybrid bear that would explain Yeti sightings, but it turns out the sampling may have been flawed. The media, as usual ,is contradicting themselves as to his other findings. But soon, it turns out, we can all read about the project in his unnamed upcoming book on the subject. Or will we? Each day, as more and more information flows across the Internet, new questions and concerns arise. Is he really an Oxford fellow? Yes, but he has not been associated with the institution for over a decade. What is this Wolfson Institute, he claims to be a member of? Turns out, it’s mythical. Sykes says he needed more college cred, so he made up a one man Institution. Humm. I wonder if I could do that and apply for Federal funds?
Why am I bringing this up? Because not much about this is new. We’ve seen this played out before. Only last the time it wasn’t Bigfoot, it was the elusive gorilla. Yet to be fair, there is one major difference between the two: contrary to popular belief (or lies-to-adults) the early 19th century science community understood the gorilla to be fact. What they could not agree on was what kind of ape was it? What did it look like? With little more than stories and a few skulls and leg bones to go by, the community was torn.
Today many Bigfoot enthusiasts use the gorilla as their go-to story on why the search for Bigfoot ought to continue. The common view is that the gorilla was myth until African explores found and killed a few. The idea that a myth turned into fact is why I picked up Monte Reel’s Between Man and Beast. An Unlikely explorer, the evolution debates, and the African Adventurer that took the Victorian world by storm.
Reel recounts the life and adventures of Paul Du Chaillu, the unlikely adventurer who brought back several stuffed gorillas along with bones and tales of the mighty beast.
What fascinated me wasn’t so much the adventure. It turns out it wasn’t all that hard to find and kill gorillas. But the scientific backlash that followed. Du Chaillu was the first to bring back a body and watch them in the wild, yet this did not stop the scientific community from calling him a fraud. It was unimaginable that a young, uneducated, underfunded Frenchman could have gone into the heart of Africa and shot gorillas.
As I read the book I could not help but be reminded again and again of Bigfoot hunters, the stories associated with the creature, and the lengths people will go to in order to ingratiate themselves into the myth of the beast. Some find it hard to believe that so many would lie about seeing such a creature. Reel’s book shows us that is a very human and often repeated human trait.
Early on in the book, as Du Chaillu first sets out to find the Gorilla, his guides tell him what we would now describe as campfire stories. In one of these stories a gorilla chases two women. One gets away, the other does not. The tribe, thinking the second woman has been eaten, is surprised upon her return. She claimed (so they say) to have been raped by the gorilla, “leaving her traumatized but otherwise unharmed”. (52) Other native stories tell of how gorillas are possessed by human spirits. In fact, spirit possession was part of the early native gorilla lore. The spirits of dead warriors inhabited gorillas and because of this, these supernatural man/apes could not be killed. Anyone who knows anything about Native American Wildman lore can see the similarities. Anyone who has read accounts of encounters with Bigfoot have read accounts of women who claim to have been raped by the beast.
You and I have probably never heard of Charles Waterton, but all of Victorian England would have known him quite well. He was a rival of John James Audubon. Both were naturalists specializing in birds, but Waterton, not content to specialize in just one thing, credited himself with discovering several species including the gorilla. Not having anyway of proving it didn’t stop him from telling stories about his adventures with the gorilla. He even claimed to have kept one as a pet, which is odd since no one ever saw it or its corpse. It was Waterton who led the charge against Du Chaillu. Waterton was an egomaniac who wanted the spotlight for himself. Perhaps on some level he believed his own stories. Yet the question I asked myself as I read this book is why, if he wanted to be the one to discover the gorilla, didn’t he? After all it turns out gorilla bones were easily attainable.
Before Du Chaillu stepped off the boat into the heart of the African jungle, he put a call out for gorilla bones and skulls. He had promised the Philadelphia Natural Society (who promised to fund his expedition) he would send ship bones to them. His request from the natives resulted in a return of so many bones that he quickly stopped paying for them. Let that sink in for a moment. Before the first white man ever set eyes on a gorilla, the creature was already a well-documented fact. Bones had been coming out of Africa for several years. They had physical proof that it existed. What the scientific community didn’t know was what the creature looked like or what he ate. Contrast this with Bigfoot. Men have been hunting him for almost 100 years, and yet not one bone has been found. There is no physical proof, yet the tie between finding Bigfoot and finding a gorilla remains. Hunters continue to use the story of the “elusive” gorilla as proof of an elusive Bigfoot.
Du Chaillu’s adventures into Africa are only a fraction of the story. In less than two months he had spotted and killed two gorillas. Let that sink in Bigfoot hunters. Europeans had some physical proof of the beast. When someone decided to brave the African interior with the sole purpose of finding a gorilla, it took just a few months to do so.
The real drama of the story played out within the scientific community as they battled to decide how the gorilla fit into their worldview. Was this proof of co-evolution or was this proof that man deserved a special place among other species? The battles between those who risk their lives to bring back new species and those who worked to qualify and classify them could be very ugly. Add into this volatile mix were dissenting voices from armchair adventurers, seeking to snatch the glory for themselves.
Reel’s book is a fascinating account of the ugly side of science normally hidden from view. The book gives Du Chaillu, a man who is lost to history, long overdue credit for bringing back not just gorillas but inspiring other adventures and writers. If it were not for Du Chaillu, Author Conan Doyle would never have thought to write The Lost World, nor Jack London Call of the Wild. Both men read and credit Du Chaillu’s book Adventures and Explorations, as their inspiration.
Isn’t it funny how some things never change? Once again we have an elusive beast in which stories of rape and spirit possession abound. The scientific community is all too eager to discredit anyone who claims to have proof of its existence and many armature explorers will do just about anything (including making fools of themselves on TV) to be the first to bag the beast. The difference of course is that this time there is no physical proof that makes this a worthwhile endeavor. Or is there? Professor Sykes, we wait on you, claws extended.
9 thoughts on “Between Man and Beast or why gorillas are not proof of Bigfoot”
Claiming there is no physical proof of sasquatch is a little heavy-handed, as there is indeed quite a bit. The question is authenticity, as well as understanding that bones aren’t the only form of proof available.
One bit that bugs me about the Sykes story that everyone is so critical about, is that he has never claimed that the hair samples he worked with actually came from a Yeti. It has always been the people who sent them in who claimed that. His claim is that the samples, whatever their provenance, appeared through his analysis to be from a species of bear.
He may have made mistakes in the genome analysis, after all, it’s a complicated science, but he hasn’t tried to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes, he’s simply trying to answer some long asked questions. And to sell some books, which is nothing to fault the man for, as long as he does things properly.
I know of no physical proof besides your good looking picture. Can you name some?
I plan on reading Sykes book. Let’s hope it does come out, so we can to hear from him.
Thousands of foot prints (some of which are very impressive and difficult to dismiss), Many credible sightings (which is quite similar to the story of the mountain gorilla), habitat modification, and of course, photographic evidence (which is a contentious point, but among the detritus lays some very interesting evidence that should not be mixed with the BS).
It’s no surprise that TV shows have found no evidence, they never actually look. The only thing they’re ever interested in is pleasing viewers and getting paid. But their track record shouldn’t be considered a reflection of the actual field of study.
Let’s also remember that the area in the Congo where mountain apes are found, is quite small when compared to the wilds of North America or the Himalayas. Thousands of square kilometers of territory that has seldom, if ever seen human boots on the ground.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Armchair Bigfooter.
Your post brought to mind a book I read about a decade ago, “Platypus: The Extraordinary Story of How a Curious Creature Baffled the World” by Ann Moyal, that portrayed similar tensions between field researchers and European scientists back home.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am sure it happens more often than not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This whole business with Sykes has turned into quite the debacle. Not just with people questioning his scientific analysis, but him apparently making up the Institute, and his new book appearing to claim the survival of Apemen, Yeti, etc…I mean, what in hell is going on?!? Just bizarre.
But this gorilla angle is fascinating! Thanks to you, I have an all-new name to look up in Du Chaillu.
Thanks for begging me to read this, haha. I always learn something new from you, Sari!
Thanks for taking the bait and reading Jason. I am always interested in your take. I learn a lot from you too my young friend.
Gorillas are social animals , living in groups of 40 +. The yeti has always been said to be solitary, much like the orang-utan.