From Cosmos to Evolution

 

The Greatest Show on Earth-l

Have any of you been watching the re-boot of Cosmos? I ask, because not many people I know are, and those who are watching have given it a lukewarm response. I have to admit, as much as I admire Neil de Grass Tyson, there is something off about this show. It feels dumbed down and sadly seems to miss many of the finer points Sagan made in the original. I’m going to give it a couple of more episodes before I completely condemn it. I just bought a copy of the original series, so look for an upcoming blog in which I compare the two.
But, I have to admit I am happy to see science education being broadcast on network television. As a country we have to admit we are not as well versed on science as we should be. Late night infomercials wouldn’t be so lucrative if we were.

So to celebrate science education I thought I would bring out an old review I did on Richard Dawkins’ bestseller, The Greatest Show on Earth, the evidence for evolution, for those who have yet to tackle the science behind our origins. This post is my science re-boot.

One advantage to college is that it exposes you to subjects that you otherwise may not touch. For me this is science. In high school I was encouraged to take agriculture as my science requirement because of my poor math skills. Since I lived on my grandparent’s farm during the summer months I laughed that I could take a class doing things I did on a daily basis. Needless to say I aced this “science” class, but my knowledge of general science was woefully lacking. During my early adult years I stayed away from science thinking I was not smart enough to get it. After taking a biology class three years ago, I found not only am I smart enough to get it, I love it and decided to learn all I can. Most of my education has come from reading science books though I have taken three science classes since biology.

Early this summer I decided to learn more about evolution. Sure I had the basics down, but really not enough to hold a good debate with the creationist in my family. Like most people what I “knew” came from what I had heard, not from what I read. Obviously one way to learn more about evolution was to read Darwin himself, but this turned out to be a very dry and boring read I am sorry to say. I looked for a modern guide to evolution; after all we have learned so much since Darwin, surely there had to be someone out there who has written a type of “update” in a engaging and entertaining way. To my surprise this turned out to be Richard Dawkins. Dawkins’ The Greatest Show on Earth, the Evidence for Evolution is a book that I feel Darwin himself would have written if he had all the facts and evidence we have now.

Like many readers I only knew Dawkins from The God Delusion and his famed Spaghetti Monster. I didn’t know Dawkins is a biologist and a rather knowledgeable and engaging one at that. His latest book The Greatest Show on Earth, the evidence for evolution taught me almost everything I need to know about evolution; why and how it works, but more importantly (at least in my mind) it got me asking questions. This is how I gauge if I am truly learning anything, when I ask follow up questions.

The book reads like a course in evolution. Dawkins starts with examples of evolution and mutation by “artificial means”. What we all take for granted but not understand is that artificial means is a type of evolution humans have been engineering since the birth of civilization. Hunter gatherers tribes would not have devolved into agrarian societies without it.
Over thousands of years man has taken the wolf from village scavengers to the many breeds of dogs we see today. A scientist in Russia did the same with foxes in the 1950’s and within just a few short generations had tame foxes. These foxes began to look and act like dogs, from the floppy ears to loyal behavior. Dawkins points to plant breeding; from our early ancestor’s ability to change /adapt wild plants to the grains and cabbages we have today, to the award winning roses we all know and love. Dawkins starts here so the reader becomes comfortable with the idea of evolution and gene mutation.

dogs

The book then moves on to how genes mutate and how DNA works. Those who may not have been exposed to these subjects beforehand can take heart that Dawkins explains this in layman’s terms. Those who have a firm grasp on the subjects can enjoy Dawkins examples of rapid evolution. There is a great story of a biologist who does an experiment on fish to determine how long it would take for them to change their spot patterns when introduced to predators. I won’t spoil it for you, but will say I have some good ammunition f the next round of discussions with my creationist minded aunt.

I will admit the middle of the book dragged a little for me. Here Dawkins goes through the nine months of gestation. Even Dawkins admits this is a little digression, but he did have a point to make. I think he could have made the point in less time. This is my only negative thought on the book; at times Dawkins eloquently explains something but then goes on to spend another page or two explaining what he just said. Either Dawkins does not have confidence in his ability to get a point across or he does not have confidence his reader will fully understand some key points. I found myself skipping some parts because of this.

Over all I would highly recommend this book to anyone who wants a better understanding of evolution or science in general. Trust me, this is no dry science book. Dawkins biting English humor emerges throughout the book. Laughter can sometimes be a great teacher.

Flobe

I think we all should have a good grasp on science if only to make us better consumers. Many books and late night infomercials rely on our lack of science knowledge in order to sell us cheesy ideas or products. Dawkins may not stop you from purchasing a self-watering glass globe that magically knows when your plants are dry, but I bet you never look at a dog or plant the same way again.

If you have a favorite science book be sure to leave a comment. I am always on the lookout for a good science read.

Happy Tolkien Day!

Happy Tolkien Day

Happy J R.R. Tolkien Day. Did you know it is Tolkien day? Well, it is. Back in 2002 a New York Times journalist asked the chairman of the Tolkien Society if the society had an official “day” something like the James Joyce Society has. They did not, but after much debate the society chose an important date from the book for the reading day. March 25th, is the Downfall of Sauron.

In celebration of Tolkien Day I offer you a few things you may not know about J R. R. Tolkien!

John Ronald Reuel (JRR) Tolkien was born on January 3, 1892 in Bloemfontein, Orange Free State (currently part of South Africa). At the age of three his mother took him and his brother back to her native England. His father died in South Africa shortly after they left.

Tolkien’s mother taught him Latin when he was 8! Around this time he also started to make up his own languages. This hobby would serve him well when writing The Lord of The Rings. Tolkien maked up a real language for the elves (Elvish) .

Tolkien served during World War 1 but was shipped home after being coming sick. It was during his recovery that he started writing a collection of short stories that would become The Silmarillion. Many of these tales take place long before the Hobbit.

In 1921, Tolkien was offered a post at the University of Leeds. During his tenure, he collaborated with E.V. Gordon on an acclaimed translation of the Middle-English poem Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, published by Oxford University Press in 1925.

In the 1930s, Tolkien, C S Lewis and other scholars, authors and philosophers met as a group that they dubbed The Inklings. In the meetings the scholars shared their work and talked philosophy. It was during this time that he started to write a story for his children that would eventualy become The Hobbit. A friend read the book and urged Tolkien to publish it. In 1937 the world was introduced to what would be become one of the best selling trilogies of all time.

Tolkien’s publisher wanted an immediate sequel but it would take Tolkien 15 years to come up with The Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Tolkien used many of the stories he had written years ago to fashion a storyline that span generations. It was the publisher’s idea to break the book up into a trilog . The books were published in 1954 &1955.

It took 10 years for them to become best sellers, when affordable paperbacks came into fashion.

The success of the books took Tolkien by surprise. The popularity of the books overwhelmed him and he withdrew from the public eye. Though Tolkien was invited to speak about the books, he was reluctant to do so. He felt the work should speak for themselves; what we think we know about the meaning behind the books is actually based on what scholars have come up with. Tolkien never said these were anti-war books; this is a popular myth that will not die, started by a scholar who was obsessed with all things Middle Earth.

There are many reasons why the trilogy became so popular. Some scholars feel the trilogy is the modern Odyssey, while others see the books as just what the world needed after experiencing two World Wars. The books clearly define heroes and villains at a time when real life in the early 20th century had blurred the lines between the two. Readers love a good myth and Tolkien has certainly given us a great modern myth. These are books that transcend culture, race and religion; which may be why they have been translated into so many languages. Readers worldwide have their own reasons for loving these book, many read the books without knowing anything scholars think we should. Though there are college and high school classes devoted to Tolkien most readers fall in love with his books without having to understand why.

Happy Tolkien Day! If you have read any of this books I would love to hear which is your favorite and why.

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

monsters, monsters, everywhere

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!