Mr. Mercedes Not what I’d expect from Stephen King

Mrmercedes

From the book’s description:

In the frigid pre-dawn hours, in a distressed Midwestern city, hundreds of desperate unemployed folks are lined up for a spot at a job fair. Without warning, a lone driver plows through the crowd in a stolen Mercedes, running over the innocent, backing up, and charging again. Eight people are killed; fifteen are wounded. The killer escapes.


In another part of town, months later, a retired cop named Bill Hodges is still haunted by the unsolved crime. When he gets a crazed letter from someone who self-identifies as the “perk” and threatens an even more diabolical attack, Hodges wakes up from his depressed and vacant retirement, hell-bent on preventing another tragedy.

Mr. Mercedes is Stephen King’s 57th novel, and is his third attempt to distance himself from the horror/supernatural genre. Who can blame the author for trying his hand at something new? This seems to be a follow up nod to the detective novel; his first being the highly acclaimed Joyland. Unfortunately this one left me, well…. uninspired.

This may sound odd as one would not think of a horror writer as inspiring, but King fans understand what I mean. King has a gift for instilling hope in the face of tragedy. We find everyday heroes, who time and time again, show us what is possible even as the odds are stacked against them. I’m thinking of Glen Bateman, Ralph Brentner, and Larry Underwood who faced with certain death, will not submit to evil. (The Stand) or Jake Epping who teaches us a very valuable lesson on fate and how sometimes memories are what keeps us going. (11/22/63) But in Bill Hodges we are introduced to yet another divorced middle-aged detective. The genre seems to demand that all great detectives be divorced and miserable. For an author who writes characters so compelling and multidimensional that fans talk about them for years afterwards, King’s latest protagonist seems run-of-the-mill. Hodges is tired of life and we can’t blame him. He has nothing going for him save the friendships (even these seem more like acquaintances than true friends) he develops with the small circle of characters King gives us.

Besides the flat characters King introduces us to (flat as in the literary term for character who serves one purpose only) I have two major issues with the book: The plot of the novel and King’s over use of the N word. Both distracted me, and left me wondering what King was thinking as he wrote this novel.

The Plot

As the description says, Bill Hodges receives a letter from a person claiming to be the Mercedes killer. This person wants to engage Hodges in an on-line conversation. I am not sure why the description says he threatens to kill again because what he really says is he is “done killing,” “I have my memories and they are clear as a bell”. After a long rant about the killing and his concern for Hodges mental state he asks for the detective’s “feedback” and invites him to join in a chat-room. Hodges’ response defies logic, given that he has a forty year career as a cop under his belt. Hodges’ response is to “wind this person up” to the point that the killer decides to kill again! As the story unfolds it is clear that most of what happens is a result of Hodges’ goading. I would be okay with this if at any point Hodges would have admitted this and taken some responsibility for what happens. Even after someone close to him dies as a result of this cat and mouse game (King calls it a fishing game) Hodges refuses to see that his need to close the case is the cause. I would expect this from James Patterson or Jonathan Kellerman but not King. This is an author who, when writing self absorbed characters does so in a way that we the reader realizes the flaw (I’m thinking Jack Torrance in The Shining). We get that part of the character’s problem is his lack of self-awareness, but not in this novel. It is as if King himself does not seem to see the flaw in his plot. The over all message of this novel shouts, “Forget the police, we can solve this ourselves!” stretched credibility. Hodges is willing to risk it all for one last shot at solving a case. Gee, where have we read this before?

The N word

I get it, we are all adults and sometimes this offensive term for African Americans shows up in literature. But King’s over-use of the word shook me out of the story. The first time we encounter the word the killer is thinking to himself as he spies on Hodges and his young black friend. The word is used to ensure that we readers become even more uncomfortable with the antagonist, but to use it over and over again to describe a family (and their dog!) got on my nerves. We get it Mr. King, the killer does not like black people, but did you need to keep reminding us of this point over and over again? Instead of drawing a picture of the killer’s mentality it made me wonder why King would feel so free to use the word. Was it a dare? Does he not understand that it is offensive to many even in it’s most casual use? It felt like a gratuitous use of this term and pulled me from the story. This is not something I would expect from a writer like King.

Maybe uninspired is the wrong word. Maybe I should say it is a disappointment. While 11/22/63 remains my favorite book of 2013 and one of my all time favorite books overall, this is the most disappointing books I’ve read in 2014.

I’d love to hear what you think. Have you read it? And if so, what is your take on the plot, the female body count and King’s newest characters.

Author: sarij

I'm a writer, lifelong bibliophile ,and researcher. I hold a Bachelors in Humanities & History and a Master's in Humanities. When I'm not reading or talking about Shakespeare or history, you can usually find me in the garden discussing science or politics with my cat.

8 thoughts on “Mr. Mercedes Not what I’d expect from Stephen King”

  1. I’m with you, especially on the racial self-depreciation. I kept turning the pages to find out what the antagonist was going to do next, but honestly didn’t feel like cheering for the detective. King still tells a solid story, but not what we’ve been expecting. And yeah, 11/22/63 rocks!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I’ve not — yet — had the pleasure of reading a King novel (is it possible? I hear you gasp) but I clearly won’t be starting with this one, Sari! Thanks for the ruthless deconstruct; it clearly needed doing.

    Like

  3. I agree with you I read the novel very different from the usual Stephen King Novel and the whole time I’m reading and run across the N word I think WOW are we really saying this again. I being African American I found it a little disturbing that a white author would use the word so freely but I did myself enjoy the novel with the exception of the use of the N word repeatedly.

    Like

    1. Kimberly,
      Thank you so much for stopping by and adding your two cents in. I was wondering what an African American reader would think of this excessive use of the N word would be. The liberal use of the word was disrespectful. I am surprised an editor did not question it. As I said in my review, I kept thinking, “okay, okay we get it”. No reason to beat us over the head with it.

      Like

  4. As an avid long-time African-American reader of Stephen King, I’ve never gotten used to him using the word. I’m currently reading his newest novel, “Revival” and a teacher in the story, commenting (at the time) on the assassination of Martin Luther King says “Now why would anyone want to shoot that Reverend King? Heaven sakes, he was a good n***er!”
    I have to say I just don’t understand why he uses it so much and so unnecessarily. In the book “It” he uses it anywhere from 30-50 times, and this is between the Black character and his father talking to each other! And I’m not talking about them arguing back and forth or using it in anger. They’re just having a normal conversation and saying, from what I recall, things like, “Well son, when you live out here on the farm and you’re a n***er, that’s all you can do”. Just entirely uncalled for, in my opinion.
    All of his African-American characters either have the habit of turning into a shuffling, Step-N-Fetchit type character to try to make their White friend laugh (as the young character in Mr. Mercedes does, and really….who does that anymore?? ESPECIALLY someone that young), or they’re just outright stereotype down-home backwoods characters, as Dick Halloran was in The Shining and the old lady (can’t think of her name, but played by Ruby Davis in the movie version) was in The Stand.
    So I’m at a loss as to why he does it. I got hooked on Stephen King around 1979 with Night Shift and with the exception of the Dark Tower series, have read almost every book he’s published.
    But that “n” word always jumps out and slaps me in the face, and I’m always offended by it.

    Like

    1. James,
      Thank you for stopping by and taking the time to comment. To be honest, I remember loving It when it came out, but do not remember the N word being used. I will also admit had that book come out today I probably would ask Mr. King about it. Damn, he had an AMA in Redditt not too long ago; now that would have been a great question to raise.
      As far as the reference in Revival, I took that to illiterate the social ignorance of the era. It was a comment that informed the reader about that particular character and his wold view far better than anything King could have described.
      By the way, Mother Abagail is the prophet from The Stand. I remember her because she reminds me of my grandmother. She lived on a farm and would wring chicken’s necks in order to make fresh fried chicken for family get togethers.
      Let me know what you think of Revival. The ending has me a little stumped.

      Like

  5. I’m also an avid black reader of Stephen King’s work and I can say I’ve probably read everything he’s written with the exception of some of the Dark Tower Series. I don’t think it’s my imagination; Stephen King has used the N word in nearly all of his work. And sometimes….it’s just uncalled for. In some instances, yes, he’s trying to make a character seem really despicable by turning him into a racist. And yes, sometimes it’s just the setting of the story, the decade of civil unrest for example. But in Revival, which I just finished, the example above was completely unnecessary. It didn’t add anything to the character, who is a good guy and it wasn’t there to illustrate the sentiments of the time, because the main character had already mentioned just one sentence prior that religion and race are big deals to Yankees. So why shoehorn in that terrible sentence? It was unnecessary and had nothing to do with the rest of the story…. I’m starting to wonder if Mr. King can even write a novel without throwing that word in there.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Crystal Lee, thank you for stopping by and sharing your feelings. I really appreciate it! I agree, I did not think it belong in revival, but then again, I don’t really think it is necessary in most of his work. I wonder why he does this and have looked to see if there are any interview questions about this subject. I have yet to find one. I will continue to read his work, yet this is an aspect of his writing that I find troubling.

      Like

Talk to me

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s