Sherlock ends with a final misogynistic solution


1519196473-funny-sherlock-holmes-showIt should come to no surprise to my readers that I thoroughly enjoy the stories of Sherlock Holmes in all their iterations. Whether the stories are from Doyle himself or from the minds of modern writers who use the famous sleuth as if he were their own. I loved the playfulness of the Downey/Law movies and the older true to form BBC adaptations. But out of all of them, none has given more pleasure than Steven Moffatt’s take in the Cumberbatch/Freeman Sherlock series. That was until this past weekend, when the four-season run finally came it stunning conclusion. I haven’t been this disappointed and disillusioned in quite some time.

For those of you who have yet to watch season four, I warn you to stop reading now. Yes, there will be spoilers and no, I don’t want to hear how I’ve ruined the show for you. So seriously, Stop. Right. Now.


For those of you still with me I am going to assume most of you have watched the show so I won’t give a blow-by-blow review. For the others, I am going to assume you are just curious to know want I am going to rant about now. Hopefully I won’t confuse you with my lack of a detailed recap.


To say this last season (series for my UK friends) has been underwhelming is an understatement. These last three shows have focused on the breakdown of the Holmes/Watson relationship and the one “final solution” that brings them back together. The idea of a break-up between these two best friends would make for good drama had it been done with care; as it was, the last three shows were cobbled together slapdashedly, with major plot holes looming so large that it’s no wonder Watson ended up in a deep well. His watery prison was an ideal metaphor for the series.

In the last episode titled “The final solution” we are asked to suspend disbelief at every turn as Sherlock faces the series’ most villainous foe yet. Among the most absurd plot devices we are asked to believe are:

Mycroft’s super-hero like ability to wipe out Sherlock’s most horrific memories and replace them with memories of a beloved pet dog named “Red beard”. Really? Mycroft has the means to do this? As the head of the government’s spy agency why doesn’t he use this power to wipe out memories of the world’s global terrorist and replace them with memories of a happy Republic? If that’s too much to ask, why not wipe out the mind of the super villain he has locked up in a Arkham like asylum, thus removing the threat all together?

That Sherlock, upon meeting this locked up super villain loses his power of deduction and doesn’t notice the obvious around him. Oh come on! He doesn’t realize the villain is not behind glass or that her voice is being “altered” by a hidden microphone.

That even though Sherlock and Watson show up to the asylum unannounced, the super villain has her traps ready and waiting for them, including a dog bowl with the name “Red beard” on it. This can only mean that Mycroft has talked to her about Sherlock. Again why not wipe her mind too since he has access to her? I don’t think I am going to get over that one.

That we see Watson chained in a well. In fact the writers make it clear that John cannot escape the rising water because of the chain on his leg, yet he is rescued when a rope is thrown down to him. Unless that rope included an underwater diver with a bolt cutter there was no way out for John to excape, but there he is safe and sound. Speaking of John, two episodes earlier his wife died saving Sherlock. Mycroft could have replaced those memories with memories of Mary dying trying to save a puppy from a burning building, thus relieving John of his more horrific memories and saving the duos friendship. At this point I think we can all agree that Mycroft is an asshole. But the most egregious mistake Moffatt and the writers make is with the villain. It’s misogynistic ,and utterly, utterly pointless.

It turns out the most wicked character Sherlock has ever faced is his younger sister Eurus, named for the God of the East wind. We not only learn that Sherlock has a sister he cannot remember, but that Mycroft has teased his younger brother about an “east wind” all his life. See, I told you Mycroft is an asshole. This younger sister is not only smarter than the two brothers (Mycroft says her brilliance is incandescent and that a mind like hers has not been seen since Newton) but that she is a vicious psychopath, lacking all forms of emotion both mentally and physically (Pain? Which one is that? She asks Mycroft). As an adult she subscribes to the philosophy that good vs. bad behaviors are merely societal constraints. She is fully aware of the contradictions of such constraints; it’s deemed bad to murder someone but killing in war is expected. She is also fully aware of the danger she poses as a woman. She answers her own question of “why am I here?”, with the chilling words, “Because I am smart”.

This smart yet very dangerous woman spends the last hour of the episode torturing Sherlock by making him responsible for the death of other people by forcing him to play “games” that can only be solved by murder. She does all of this because though she lacks every other emotion, jealousy is her driving motivation. Jealousy is a trope we see used in literature over and over again as the expression of out of control women. To see it here is madding.

Eurus we learn had no friends and was jealous of Sherlock and his small boyhood companion. So much so, that she drowns this companion in a deep well and sets the Holmes estate on fire, hoping to kill Sherlock. It is at this point that she is locked up for life. There is no attempt to rehabilitate or even medicate this smart yet dangerous woman; Mycroft forbids it. In this he renders her help-less. Wiping out Sherlock’s memory of her effectively kills her. He completes this “murder” by telling his parents she has died in a fire. If this isn’t misogynistic I don’t know what is, yet it only gets worse from here.

In the most mind-bending side plot of the series, Sherlock is a willing victim in his sister’s games in order to save a little girl who he thinks is trapped on a doomed airplane. It turns out, the little girl who really needs saving is his sister, because despite all of her wickedness and psychosis, what she really needs is love from her older sibling. Yes, in the end, Sherlock is able to save her by a goddamn hug.

The episode ends with the family being reunited and all seems well. Yet the viewers are left with a damning question left unanswered. Why is Sherlock’s sister now unable to speak? Though the reasons for her incarceration appear to be gone she is left in the asylum, unable to speak, thus unable to defend herself against those who wish to keep the smart one locked up.

Not only was this a terrible way to end what started out as a brilliant show, it did so in the most misogynistic way possible. I can only surmise that Mark Gatiss, the man who plays Mycroft, and one of the lead producers, is also an asshole. Too bad he can’t wipe out the viewer’s memories of this last episode and replace it with a better one.


Author: sarij

I'm a writer, lifelong bibliophile ,and researcher. I hold a Bachelors in Humanities & History and a Master's in Humanities. When I'm not reading or talking about Shakespeare or history, you can usually find me in the garden discussing science or politics with my cat.

7 thoughts on “Sherlock ends with a final misogynistic solution”

  1. I have not seen the latest season (I loved the first two), but reading this article has convinced me to skip it entirely, so thanks for helping me avoid a stinker. What a terrible thing to do to Sherlock!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I entirely agree with you. As someone who actually partially earns a living from Sherlock, I was disappointed with the recent series too though in truth I think the rot had set in a while earlier. I’m never a fan of when a TV show moves away from its origins. I like Star Trek exploring strange new worlds and civilisations, not fighing endless wars or tackling rebels trying to infiltrate or change Starfleet. If TV people want to make such a show… fine just do it in their own series and don’t ruin Star Trek.

    The same with Sherlock. It should be relatively straightforward to have Sherlock solving unsolveable crimes at a fairly basic but very clever level as occurred in the first season. Why must it evolve into something it isn’t? Why make it a poor version of James Bond when there are already shows that cover this such as Spooks (MI5 in the USA??). Especially as there are so few episodes to begin with, it’s not like we are 100 adventures into Sherlock and we are all bored with it.

    Much has been said that the reason for the scarcity of episodes and long gaps between them is due to the soaring success of the actors. Fair enough but perhaps filming wouldn’t take so long if they kept to the scope of the original show. Other BBC shows film episodes in a week, soaps film several a week. A more grounded Sherlock as per the first season or two could surely be filmed in a week or a little more. Flying around Britain in helicopters and having car chases obviously takes a lot longer to make but I would say that such things shouldn’t be in Sherlock anyway.

    So yes, in terms of pop culture, it is probably the biggest let down since Jar Jar Binks and George Lucas conspired to destroy the childhoods of us 70s and 80s children with the prequels. If they are going to make just 2 or 3 shows every year or two then the very least they owe us is to make sense and be good stories. As you say, nothing makes much sense. Why must the entire Holmes family be geniuses? Why if must we have a mystery sibling sprung on us after all these years must she be super bad or super misunderstood? How boring. Really 13 million people or so in London… can we not simply have a villanous plot involving one of those? You’re right again about the well, rope and lock breaking equipment… the sort of convenient escapes that audiences in the 1940s would pick up on in Flash Gordon.

    That whole thing with the girl on the plane made no sense in anyway, the long gaps when she must have been waiting for Sherlock would surely have driven her as crazy as it did the audience. I’m sure at one point Sherlock asked her to go somewhere else on the plane only for him to do a task and then 20 minutes later, she still hadn’t got there. I didn’t even get his sister ‘being on the plane’ I just assumed it was another plot hole. People escaping from wells, people jumping infront of bullets, planes crashing into London and no-one caring.

    Never mind all those bland questions, Sherlock never once actually asked the girl where she was flying to… surely the easiest way to track her down. I agree with you about Mycroft too. So they might not make any more Sherlock but would that be a loss? That I even ask that question shows what a wasted opportunity it all is.

    Sad that one of the highlights of the entire 4th season for me was the little montage at the end of life returning to normal and Sherlock solving the various cases of oddballs and mysteries…. surely all I ever wanted in the first place.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! I so agree with all of your points. Once the series started to go down the soap-opera road it also headed downhill. The fun of Sherlock is watching him solve mysteries. The point of him lacking personality is so that the stories continue to center around the cases. The irony of this modern version, one that could have taken Sherlock anywhere in the world is that Moffatt locked him a bubble that apparently only contained a few people.
      I will continue to support writers like yourself and let the written word take me on new adventures.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you! I’m not worthy 🙂 but have some new books coming out in spring. Yes, Sherlock is all about watching him solve mysteries. That’s why I liked the little bit at the end. Using the new technology of the internet and phones was such a great idea and finding a new way to re-interpet the original stories too, they had the whole world. You just have to spend a few minutes in London or New York to see the most amazing or weird things but Sherlock doesn’t do any of that. I don’t know if you ever watch Dr Who but I felt the same way with that. I don’t care about the personal lives of his assistants…. boring, I can see about normal relationships 24/7 but just 1 hour a week to travel through time and space and that is what I want to see there.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Stephen Liddell Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste


Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Self-Centric Design

The art of designing your life

The Ineluctable Bookshelf

Reading, writing, and states in between

Lizzie Ross

Reading, writing, dreaming


Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

a collection of trivia, fun facts, humor, and interesting notions.

Elan Mudrow



Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

I write about monsters to explore what it is to be human.

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics


The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution


Welcome to the world of cats!

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers


screams from the void

%d bloggers like this: