The devil you know

 

9781403969330

Whenever I walk into a casino here in Nevada, I’m reminded of the story of Job. Gamblers have their favorite places to play, depending on the type of “perks” offered. Some will be thrilled with “free” meal coupons; others “free” drink chips while others enjoy the benefit of discounted event and hotel lodging rates. Most do not understand none of this is truly free. The casinos can afford to give away free stuff and do so liberally, because they want something in return; your money and loyalty. Like Satan, who questioned Job’s loyalty to God, I have to wonder, “how many of these gamblers would continue to worship at the altar of slot machines if these freebies were taken away”?

As you recall, one day God assembled his small counsel apparently to brag about the humans who worship him. “Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one like him on earth, a blameless and upright man who fears God and turns away from evil”. (Job. 1 8)

Hassantan, (Satan’s original name) replies, “Have you not put a fence around him and his house and all that he has on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land”. (Job 1.10) Satan is questioning God’s assertion because Job seems only too happy to continue to worship and give thanks to God for everything he has. But, what would happen if everything were to be taken away? Would Job continue to worship God? The two enter into a cosmic bet. God allows Satan to take everything away from Job, including his family, in order to test the man’s faith. In the end, after loosing it all, Job continues to worship God even as he question’s God’s actions. Job continues to worship because he thinks there will be a big payoff at the end of his life. So too did loyal gamblers, when, during the recession, casinos pulled back on perks. Like Job they hope for a big payoff.

I don’t bring this up to talk about gambling. This to me is one big cosmic joke; that people continue to spend their hard earned money on slot machines, hoping to strike it rich all while sitting in houses of opulence. Don’t they get that the house always wins?

I bring this up to talk about the Satan we know, or at least think we know. T.J. Wray and Gregory Mobley are the authors of, the birth of satan, Tracing The Devil’s Biblical Roots .(their use of capitalization, not mine) In it, they trace the origin and evolution of Satan. It is a well researched book into the history of how Hassantan (meaning adversary) went from being one of God’s counsel members, the one who tests human loyalty, to being the cause of misery and evil; a being God seems to have little control over.

As the story of Job illustrates, Satan’s original role in the Bible was simply to be an adviser to God. Satan was allowed to roam Earth, checking on human progress and action. He reported back to God. This is why he and God started to discuss Job and why God entered into a bet with him. This is not a story of a clash of Titans; this is a story in which a supreme being allowed a lesser being to bring strife to another creature.

The next time we see Satan is in the book of Zechariah, in which yet another small counsel is formed. This time, a priest named Joshua is being tested to see if he is worthy of being a co-regent in post- exile Jerusalem. Here, Satan is playing “devil’s advocate” as he sits and accuses the priest of being sinful. The Bible does not tell us what sins Joshua has committed, but that God has decided to forgive him. God rebukes Satan and draws his own conclusion about the priest. Yet it is worth noting that once again the two are working together. Satan, it seems, was just doing his job.

What I found most interesting about this book is not so much how the evolution of Satan takes place-as people started to question a God who is both wise and wrathful a physical personality split takes place- but that the Satan we know is not found in the Bible. The hellish creature with a pitchfork and horns is found in stories that did not make it into the Hebrew or Christian bibles. This fascinates me because this means most of what we know comes down to us from oral traditions.

The stories may not have made it into our sacred text, but are stories that were passed around and talked about. People would have heard about the evils of Satan in church and then at home. What we think we know comes from hundreds of years of embellishment to fit the time. Western literature has also had a role in the evolution of Satan. You will find him in all his glory in Milton’s Paradise Lost and Dante’s Inferno. We need to keep in mind that the original monotheistic believers did not intend to have opposing celestial beings. Their one true god was equally wrathful and loving. It is only after having so many bad things happen that the chosen people begin to question their god of choice. Something was wrong with this picture.

After reading the book, it became clear that God’s original adversary evolved for two reasons. First, as people became uncomfortable with a God who both gives and takes away and began questioning the value of worshiping him, a split had to take place. We see this evident split in the pages of the Hebrew Bible. In the book of Samuel it is God who incited David to count the people of Israel. Census taking is forbidden in Exodus, but in Samuel, God is mad at the people of Israel and brings a plague upon the people. “Again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go and count the people of Israel and Judah.” (Sam. 24-1) In Chronicles, written much later, it is Satan who is the cause of the census and plague, “Satan stood up against Israel, and incited David to count the people of Israel. (Chron 21.1) This later retelling of the same story, shifts the blame from God to Satan. Innocent people died, not by the hand of God, but by the evil of Satan.

The second reason is that as humans we just can’t seem to handle personal responsibility. Maybe this flaw is part of our genetic makeup because early man had little control over his environment. The natural world was a harsh place. Early man had to live with the fact that “shit happened”. From this the first motto of man may have been, “it’s not my fault”. We havn’t seemed to let this one go.

The book isn’t just a look at how Satan evolved in the Bible, but also of how we view him. He is often the embodiment of whatever evil is taking place at the time. We use him to explain that which we cannot control. He is why shit happens. For the authors, this is important and why he matters. I highly recommend the book. Decide for yourself if he is a character worth keeping.

Mr. Mercedes Not what I’d expect from Stephen King

Mrmercedes

From the book’s description:

In the frigid pre-dawn hours, in a distressed Midwestern city, hundreds of desperate unemployed folks are lined up for a spot at a job fair. Without warning, a lone driver plows through the crowd in a stolen Mercedes, running over the innocent, backing up, and charging again. Eight people are killed; fifteen are wounded. The killer escapes.


In another part of town, months later, a retired cop named Bill Hodges is still haunted by the unsolved crime. When he gets a crazed letter from someone who self-identifies as the “perk” and threatens an even more diabolical attack, Hodges wakes up from his depressed and vacant retirement, hell-bent on preventing another tragedy.

Mr. Mercedes is Stephen King’s 57th novel, and is his third attempt to distance himself from the horror/supernatural genre. Who can blame the author for trying his hand at something new? This seems to be a follow up nod to the detective novel; his first being the highly acclaimed Joyland. Unfortunately this one left me, well…. uninspired.

This may sound odd as one would not think of a horror writer as inspiring, but King fans understand what I mean. King has a gift for instilling hope in the face of tragedy. We find everyday heroes, who time and time again, show us what is possible even as the odds are stacked against them. I’m thinking of Glen Bateman, Ralph Brentner, and Larry Underwood who faced with certain death, will not submit to evil. (The Stand) or Jake Epping who teaches us a very valuable lesson on fate and how sometimes memories are what keeps us going. (11/22/63) But in Bill Hodges we are introduced to yet another divorced middle-aged detective. The genre seems to demand that all great detectives be divorced and miserable. For an author who writes characters so compelling and multidimensional that fans talk about them for years afterwards, King’s latest protagonist seems run-of-the-mill. Hodges is tired of life and we can’t blame him. He has nothing going for him save the friendships (even these seem more like acquaintances than true friends) he develops with the small circle of characters King gives us.

Besides the flat characters King introduces us to (flat as in the literary term for character who serves one purpose only) I have two major issues with the book: The plot of the novel and King’s over use of the N word. Both distracted me, and left me wondering what King was thinking as he wrote this novel.

The Plot

As the description says, Bill Hodges receives a letter from a person claiming to be the Mercedes killer. This person wants to engage Hodges in an on-line conversation. I am not sure why the description says he threatens to kill again because what he really says is he is “done killing,” “I have my memories and they are clear as a bell”. After a long rant about the killing and his concern for Hodges mental state he asks for the detective’s “feedback” and invites him to join in a chat-room. Hodges’ response defies logic, given that he has a forty year career as a cop under his belt. Hodges’ response is to “wind this person up” to the point that the killer decides to kill again! As the story unfolds it is clear that most of what happens is a result of Hodges’ goading. I would be okay with this if at any point Hodges would have admitted this and taken some responsibility for what happens. Even after someone close to him dies as a result of this cat and mouse game (King calls it a fishing game) Hodges refuses to see that his need to close the case is the cause. I would expect this from James Patterson or Jonathan Kellerman but not King. This is an author who, when writing self absorbed characters does so in a way that we the reader realizes the flaw (I’m thinking Jack Torrance in The Shining). We get that part of the character’s problem is his lack of self-awareness, but not in this novel. It is as if King himself does not seem to see the flaw in his plot. The over all message of this novel shouts, “Forget the police, we can solve this ourselves!” stretched credibility. Hodges is willing to risk it all for one last shot at solving a case. Gee, where have we read this before?

The N word

I get it, we are all adults and sometimes this offensive term for African Americans shows up in literature. But King’s over-use of the word shook me out of the story. The first time we encounter the word the killer is thinking to himself as he spies on Hodges and his young black friend. The word is used to ensure that we readers become even more uncomfortable with the antagonist, but to use it over and over again to describe a family (and their dog!) got on my nerves. We get it Mr. King, the killer does not like black people, but did you need to keep reminding us of this point over and over again? Instead of drawing a picture of the killer’s mentality it made me wonder why King would feel so free to use the word. Was it a dare? Does he not understand that it is offensive to many even in it’s most casual use? It felt like a gratuitous use of this term and pulled me from the story. This is not something I would expect from a writer like King.

Maybe uninspired is the wrong word. Maybe I should say it is a disappointment. While 11/22/63 remains my favorite book of 2013 and one of my all time favorite books overall, this is the most disappointing books I’ve read in 2014.

I’d love to hear what you think. Have you read it? And if so, what is your take on the plot, the female body count and King’s newest characters.

Amazing Waste

Repurposing Food and Reducing Waste

measurestillformeasure

Shakespeare, Classics, Theatre, Thoughts

Nerd Cactus

Quirky Intellect for the Discerning Nerd

Sillyverse

Stories of magic and mystery

Commonplace Fun Facts

Mind-Blowing Facts You Didn’t Know

Fictionophile

Fiction reviews, Bookblogger, Fiction book reviews, books, crime fiction, author interviews, mystery series, cover, love, bookish thoughts...

Patrick W. Marsh

monsters, monsters, everywhere

Shakespeare for Kids Books

Opening the door for kids to love Shakespeare and the classics

desperatelyseekingcymbeline

The 10-year Shakespeare New Year Resolution

Katzenworld

Welcome to the world of cats!

booksandopinions.com

The Book Reviews You Can Trust!

The Book Review Directory

For Readers and Writers

thelitcritguy

screams from the void

Author Adrienne Morris

Step Into the Past—Lose Yourself in the Story.

crafty theatre

ideas inspired by crafty characters

Critical Dispatches

Reports from my somewhat unusual life

The Nerd Nebula

The Nucleus of the Universe for all Nerd Hacks!